When I started this blog about a decade ago, I always hoped it would be a useful reference for people seeking credible arguments about science, religion, politics, and other social issues, backed with a consistent ethical standard. Little did I know just how far my words would travel!
Recently, other bloggers that are critics of the Baha’i Faith have begin taking my words and directly posting them onto their own blogs and even on one video on YouTube, much to my astonishment.
First the video, based on Four Ways to Create a Religion of Hypocrites
Which also appears here: http://bahaism.blogspot.com/2016/12/4-ways-to-create-religion-of-hypocrites.html
The original blog entry was copied here: http://bahaism.blogspot.com/2015/07/four-ways-to-create-religion-of.html
That same blog also reposted several other blog entries of mine:
http://bahaism.blogspot.com/2010/07/fatal-flaw-in-bahai-authority.html
http://bahaism.blogspot.com/2011/10/universal-house-of-international.html
http://bahaism.blogspot.com/2015/07/equality-of-sexes-not-in-bahai-faith.html
http://bahaism.blogspot.com/2015/10/bahai-scandals.html
http://bahaism.blogspot.com/2017/02/why-i-abandoned-haifan-bahai-faith.html
http://bahaism.blogspot.com/2016/04/dale-husbands-battle-on-amazon-with.html
When it comes to faithfulness and accuracy in quoting my writings, Others, not so much.
‘s blog is indeed the best.Here are other examples of blog entries elsewhere that got it right, mostly:
https://thebahaiinsider.com/2015/11/02/some-interesting-bahai-scandals/
http://en.bahairesearch.org/article/independent-investigation-truth-baha%E2%80%99i-case-hypocrisy
http://en.bahairesearch.org/article/fatal-flaw-baha%E2%80%99i-authority
http://en.bahairesearch.org/article/why-i-abandoned-haifan-baha%E2%80%99i-faith
Another blogger, Ed Darrell, referred to one of my early statements on climate change, which is an even bigger issue to me than the Baha’i Faith:
Which actually came from here:
https://dalehusband.wordpress.com/2009/11/10/damning-evidence-of-fraud-by-nils-axel-morner/
And loooooong before any of that, one of my oldest online friends referred to my blog here:
https://dovaryeh.wordpress.com/2007/07/29/fundamentalism-second-take/
Which came from here:
https://dalehusband.wordpress.com/2007/07/23/religious-fundamentalism-is-blasphemy/
Earlier, he made this: https://dovaryeh.wordpress.com/2007/07/29/science-can-it-dictate-ethics/
Which referred to this: https://dalehusband.com/2007/07/21/three-opponents-three-different-results/
Which is also more important in some ways than criticizing the Baha’i Faith.
The real issue is of honesty, not what one beleives. I don’t care if you bow down and worship a blue bull, as long as you don’t LIE to us about how that bull is not only your god, but is somehow a god to everyone else and that there is credible scientific and scholarly evidence to support your dogmas about the bull.
Anyone can read the Bible with his own eyes and mind and see that it is chock full of historical errors, contradictions, logical failings, and absurdities. So what do Christian apologists do to explain them away? Word gaming, nothing more! Once you start down that perverse path, with no test in reality, there need be no end to it. One lie is defended by another lie, and then you tell yet more lies to support the earlier ones. It just becomes a habit that is impossible to break, because doing so would make your whole case fall apart and you would lose your blind and ignorant following which gives you your power!
That’s how religious apologetics works, and Creationism is merely religious apologetics with scientific terminology. Nothing more.