Monthly Archives: November 2025

Professor Archive, a YouTube Channel full of A I Crap!

Posted on by

A few months ago, I discovered a YouTube channel that seemed to be documenting accounts of the decline of Christianity across America. 

https://www.youtube.com/@ProfessorArchive

Here is an example of one of its critical videos:

And another:

And yet another:

It’s the same message over and over, over and over, OVER AND OVER:  “Christianity in America is dying, Christianity in America is dying, Christianity in America is dying, Christianity in America is dying, Christianity in America is dying, Christianity in America is dying, Christianity in America is dying, Christianity in America is dying, Christianity in America is dying, Christianity in America is dying, Christianity in America is dying, Christianity in America is dying…..”
As an ex-Christian, you’d think I’d be happy by this news. But my critical thinking doesn’t get turned off because the content says what I WANT to believe; that is known as confirmation bias.

There are two things fundamentally wrong with Professor Archive’s content. First, it is clear that every single video is made with tons of images generated with A I rather than genuine pictures of real people. Second, that channel releases TWO videos every day. This is what I call “flooding”, a brazen attempt to get as much attention as possible via excessive content, even if that content is inferior in quality.

Because of this, I am certain there will be a HUGE backlash against Professor Archive’s content. Christians who come across it will rightfully call his videos fake and therefore argue that everything he says are lies. His credibility will soon be destroyed before the public. 

It would be better for him to only make ONE video a week and use REAL images in all of them, deal with a variety of subjects instead of obsessively focusing on bashing Christianity, and make positive statements about how some things in the world are improving or at least give advice on how to improve things. Like I do when I promote Unitarian Universalism.

I therefore reject and denounce Professor Archive’s content as worthless. For the record, I NEVER use A I content in this blog; everything I have ever made here was generated by my own natural intelligence. And that’s the only writing I think should be accepted, especially on serious academic subjects.

Wahid Azal vs Chris Bennette

Posted on by

One of the most notable characteristics of a toxic narcissist is that they are addicted to drama, including picking fights with anyone that differs from them or refuses to follow them. They never learn from their mistakes because they already believe they are perfect, so they see all others as lesser beings. If you are not one of their loyal followers, you are their enemy….there is no third category of person for them. Nowhere is this more obvious than with Wahid Azal, as I myself have documented over several years on this very blog. His making an enemy of me enabled me to destroy what little credibility he ever had by documenting all his bullshit and treachery at me and others.

Now, that idiot has picked another fight with another blogger on substack: Chris Bennett, who specializes in reporting on the relationship between drugs and religion. Below are links to their blog entries attacking each other.

Those of Chris Bennett:

https://substack.com/home/post/p-178087969

Also found here:  https://www.cannabisculture.com/content/2025/11/05/getting-high-with-the-bab-the-drug-infused-origins-of-the-bahai-some-notes/

An account of the Babis’ involvement in drugs. Wahid Azal professes to be a Babi.

https://substack.com/home/post/p-178295073

Also found here:  https://www.cannabisculture.com/content/2025/11/16/questions-about-the-2014-iranian-psychedelic-fatwa-and-wahid-azal/

Bennett’s first direct attack on Azal himself, questioning the credibility of his claim regarding a certain Iranian Islamic leader’s endorsement of drug use.

https://substack.com/home/post/p-179057562

Also found here:  https://www.cannabisculture.com/content/2025/11/20/the-strange-case-of-wahid-azal-bayan-messiah-or-blaspheming-madman/

Bennett’s second attack, giving extensive details of Azal’s life, included a long part about his feud with me that Bennett titles “The Dale Husband Saga”.   

Dale Husband is a former Baháʼí turned Unitarian Universalist and outspoken ex-Baháʼí activist, who runs a blog called “Dale Husband’s Intellectual Rants” focused on religious skepticism and critiques of organized religion. His relationship with Wahid Azal began as a notable online alliance in regards anti-Baháʼí rhetoric, but devolved into a bitter, public feud marked by accusations of betrayal, slander, and legal threats. Below, I’ll break down how it began and ended, based primarily on Husband’s detailed blog documentation and cross-referenced public records like podcasts and Reddit posts.

I should clarify that I was actually a UU before converting to the Baha’i Faith and I became a Baha’i because I was convinced it had the same values as Unitarian Universalism. Learning how messed up that cult actually was drove me right back to UUism. And my blog deals with many other issues besides religion, as the list of my blog’s many categories makes clear. But ALL my blog entries here are driven by my dedicated ethical values.

Wahid, like most narcissists, was very good at showing his “good” side towards me to gain my trust, and I can only assume, in hindsight, that he was hoping I would eventually be converted to his own wacko Bayani/Marxist teachings. Once it became clear to him I would never become his follower (I am both an ATHIEST and anti-Communist), he discarded me. The split between him and me was inevitable; my rejecting his bullshit in the exBaha’i subreddit merely helped bring it about when it did.

https://substack.com/home/post/p-179978814

Here Bennett responds to some of Wahid’s attacks on him.

And as for those attacks…..

https://wahidazal303.blogspot.com/2025/11/the-reefer-reich-how-chris-bennetts-der.html

https://substack.com/@wahidazal66/p-179659410

https://substack.com/@wahidazal66/p-179810294

https://substack.com/@wahidazal66/p-179903062

In which Azal defends himself against Bennett’s denial of the authenticity of his claims regarding the Iranian Islamic leader’s endorsement of drug use.

https://wahidazal303.blogspot.com/2025/11/racialised-polemics-violent-epistemic.html

https://substack.com/@wahidazal66/p-179697242

https://substack.com/@wahidazal66/p-179796245

https://substack.com/@wahidazal66/p-179913019

It’s kind of funny how Azal tries to depict Bennett as some sort of neo-Nazi. Just because someone questions your credibility doesn’t mean you can call your opponent racist. Does Azal even know or care what actual racism is? Incidentally, Bennett himself directed me to view two of Azal’s responses. Needless to say, I wasn’t impressed. Same shit, different day and topic, eh?

UPDATE: A couple of days after this blog entry dropped, the Satan of Babyism sent me  a couple of comments.

Well, he LIED again!

https://chrisbennett420.substack.com/p/wahid-azal-and-me-the-flavour-of